Terug naar Encyclopedie

Material versus Immaterial Damage in Delft: Differences and Combination

Differences between material and immaterial damage in Delft injury claims, such as bicycle accidents on the Markt, with combination tips, table and local examples.

1 min leestijd

Material versus Immaterial Damage: Differences and Combination in Delft

In Delft, where cyclists and pedestrians are often involved in accidents on the bustling Markt or along the canals, material damage comprises measurable costs such as hospital bills at Reinier de Graaf Hospital and loss of income (Article 6:95 BW). Immaterial damage concerns compensation for suffering (smartengeld) for pain and suffering, such as pain after a collision on Phoenixstraat. Both are combined in personal injury claims at the District Court of The Hague, Delft branch.

Key Differences

AspectMaterialImmaterial
CalculationInvoices from Reinier de Graaf and payslipsEquity, Smartengeld Guide and medical reports
EvidenceQuantifiable via receipts and salaryMedical specialists and subjective testimonies
Financial ImpactDirect financial, e.g. bicycle repairPsychological, such as fear of crossing canals

Combining Claims in Delft

Example from Delft practice: after a bicycle accident on Oude Delft €28,000 material (medical costs and loss of income) + €18,000 immaterial. Full damage compensation requires claiming both via a local personal injury lawyer. Tax-free, but offsettable against benefits from the Juridisch Loket Delft.

Strategy: Engage a Delft expert for total damage assessment, taking into account local traffic congestion around Delft University of Technology. This way you maximize the payout and recover faster.